10Apr A Resolution Professional will come within the meaning of ‘Public Servant’ under Section 2(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 233 of IBC does not protect where he has been apprehended red-handed with the bribe amount – Sanjay Kumar Agarwal Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, Anti Corruption Bureau, Dhanbad – Jharkhand High Court Posted by IBC Laws Editoron April 10, 2023July 15, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-High Courts, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
24Feb Shifting the entire blame on Resolution Professional on grounds of non-performance of duty and making him the scapegoat does not appear to be justified – Shri Guru Containers Vs. Jitendra Palande – NCLAT New Delhi Posted by IBC Laws Editoron February 24, 2023July 22, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
22Nov No issue of bias in case of Resolution Professional’s name is recommended by Creditor in Personal Guarantor insolvency application and the object and purpose both of signature and giving written consent of Resolution Professional is same in Form C of application under Section 95 of IBC – Rahul Arunprasad Patel Vs. State Bank of India – NCLAT New Delhi Posted by IBC Laws Editoron November 22, 2022October 19, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
11Nov Can Suspended Board of Directors prefer appeal before NCLAT under Section 22(3) of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 which enjoins CoC to replace the Interim Resolution Professional(IRP) – Sunit Suri Vs. Mr. Ahsan Ahmed (RP) SDU Travels Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT Chennai Posted by IBC Laws Editoron November 11, 2022July 22, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
10Nov Dr. Jose Paul Vs. Nucleus Premium Properties Pvt. Ltd. – NCLT Kochi Bench Posted by IBC Laws Editoron November 10, 2022July 20, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-NCLT Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
07Nov No prohibition can be read in the statutory provision governing appearance of an Advocate in representing a different company in separate proceedings filed under Section 7 – Anand Varma, Advocate Vs. Piyush Periwal & Ors. – NCLAT New Delhi Posted by IBC Laws Editoron November 7, 2022July 15, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
06Sep Shri Alok Kaushik Erstwhile RP of Cheema Spintex Ltd. Vs. Cheema Spintex – NCLAT New Delhi Posted by IBC Laws Editoron September 6, 2022July 22, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
04Mar Suspended Board of Directors under the Code, 2016 do not have power to replace a Resolution Professional – Anil Kumar Ojha Vs. Chandramouli Ramasubramaniam RP of SLO Industrial Ltd. & Anr. – NCLAT Chennai Posted by Ramroopon March 4, 2022July 22, 2023in Decoding the Code-Case Laws Collection, IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
02Feb Drive India Enterprise Solutions Ltd. Vs. Valay Group – NCLAT New Delhi Posted by Ramroopon February 2, 2022July 20, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
25Jan The Resolution Plan even though it is not a confidential document after its approval, cannot be made available to each and to anyone who has no genuine claim or interest in the process – Association of aggrieved Workmen of Jet Airways (India) Ltd. Vs. Jet Airways (India) Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi Posted by Ramroopon January 25, 2022July 21, 2023in IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT, Newsletter-IBC Case Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.
