Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content. Login
The word used “may” under Section 99(2) cannot be construed as mandatory one and it gives only discretionary however to the Resolution professional – KEB Hana Bank Vs. Mr. Rohit Nath – DRT Chennai Bench (DRT-II) IBC-Case Laws-DRT
Assets Care and Reconstruction Enterprise Ltd. Vs. Mr Ramji Harakchand Shah – DRT Mumbai IBC-Case Laws-DRT
ArcelorMittal India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State Bank of India – DRT Ahmedabad Bench (DRT-1) Case Laws-SARFAESI-DRT, IBC-Case Laws-DRT
If Secured Financial Creditors have assigned their entire debt from the Borrower to the Successful Resolution Applicant under a Resolution Plan, they cannot invoke the Personal Guarantees after approval of the Resolution Plan – State Bank of India Vs. Mr. Prashant S. Ruia – DRT Ahmedabad Bench (DRT-1) Case Laws-SARFAESI-DRT, IBC-Case Laws-DRT, Newsletter-IBC Case
Initiation of Bankruptcy process against a Personal Guarantor – KEB Hana Bank Vs. Mr. Rohit Nath -DRT Chennai Bench (DRT-II) IBC-Case Laws-DRT, Newsletter-IBC Case
