Union of India Vs. Col. L.S.N. Murthy & Anr. – Supreme Court
I. Case Reference Case Citation : (2017) ibclaw.in 484 SC Case Name : Union of India Vs. Col. L.S.N. […]
Union of India Vs. Col. L.S.N. Murthy & Anr. – Supreme Court Read Post »
I. Case Reference Case Citation : (2017) ibclaw.in 484 SC Case Name : Union of India Vs. Col. L.S.N. […]
Union of India Vs. Col. L.S.N. Murthy & Anr. – Supreme Court Read Post »
I. Case Reference Case Citation : (2017) ibclaw.in 661 SC Case Name : Union of India & Anr. Vs.
Union of India & Anr. Vs. Deepak Electric & Trading Company & Anr. – Supreme Court Read Post »
An arbitral tribunal cannot of course make use of their personal knowledge of the facts of the dispute, which is not a part of the record, to decide the dispute. But an arbitral tribunal can certainly use their expert or technical knowledge or the general knowledge about the particular trade, in deciding a matter. In fact, that is why in many arbitrations, persons with technical knowledge, are appointed as they will be well-versed with the practices and customs in the respective fields. All that the arbitrators have referred is the market practice. That cannot be considered as using some personal knowledge of facts of a transaction, to decide a dispute.
I. Case Reference Case Citation : (2017) ibclaw.in 472 SC Case Name : Sanjeev Kumar Jain Vs. Raghubir Saran
Sanjeev Kumar Jain Vs. Raghubir Saran Charitable Trust & Ors. – Supreme Court Read Post »
(2017) ibclaw.in 247 SC IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Chloro Controls (I) Pvt. Ltd.v.Severn Trent Water Purification Inc.
I. Case Reference Case Citation : (2017) ibclaw.in 136 SC Case Name : Har Devi Asnani Vs. State of
Har Devi Asnani Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others – Supreme Court Read Post »
Section 25 (c) provides that in the event a party fails to appear at an oral hearing or to produce documentary evidence, the arbitral tribunal may continue the proceedings, and make the arbitral award on the evidence before it. This evidence can be sought either from any third person or from a party to the proceeding itself. The substitution of the phrase “parties and witnesses” under Section 43 of the earlier act by the phrase ’any person’ cannot make any difference, or cannot be read to whittle down the powers of the Arbitral Tribunal to seek assistance from the court where any person who is not cooperating with the Arbitral Tribunal or where any evidence is required from any person, be it a party to the proceedings or others. It is an enabling provision, and it has to be read as such. The term ’any person’ appearing under Section 27 (2) (c) is wide enough to cover not merely the witnesses, but also the parties to the proceeding. It is undoubtedly clear that if a party fails to appear before the Arbitral Tribunal, the Tribunal can proceed ex-parte, as provided under Section 25 (c). At the same time, it cannot be ignored that the Tribunal is required to make an award on the merits of the claim placed before it. For that purpose, if any evidence becomes necessary, the Tribunal ought to have the power to get the evidence, and it is for this purpose only that this enabling section has been provided.
I. Case Reference Case Citation : (2017) ibclaw.in 450 SC Case Name : Bharat Rasiklal Ashra Vs. Gautam Rasiklal
I. Case Reference Case Citation : (2017) ibclaw.in 114 SC Case Name : Common Cause (A Regd. Society) Vs.
Common Cause (A Regd. Society) Vs. Union of India & Anr. – Supreme Court of India Read Post »
I. Case Reference Case Citation : (2017) ibclaw.in 901 SC Case Name : FIL Industries Ltd. Vs. Imtiyaz Ahmed
FIL Industries Ltd. Vs. Imtiyaz Ahmed Bhat – Supreme Court Read Post »