Mr. Justice Subramonium Prasad 

The issuance of lookout circular cannot be resorted to in every case of Bank loan defaults | Fundamental Right of a Citizen of the Country to travel abroad cannot be curtailed only because of failure to pay a bank loan – Balram Garg Vs. Union of India and Anr. – Delhi High Court

Hon’ble Delhi High Court held that mere inability to pay money without there being a criminal case cannot be a reason to take away the Fundamental Right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Right to travel abroad has been held to be a Fundamental Right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India which cannot be taken away in an arbitrary and illegal manner. The issuance of lookout circular cannot be resorted to in every case of bank loan defaults or credit facilities availed for business and the Fundamental Right of a citizen of the country to travel abroad cannot be curtailed only because of failure to pay a bank loan more so when the person against whom the lookout circular is opened has not been even arrayed as an accused in any offence for misappropriation or siphoning off the loan amounts.

The issuance of lookout circular cannot be resorted to in every case of Bank loan defaults | Fundamental Right of a Citizen of the Country to travel abroad cannot be curtailed only because of failure to pay a bank loan – Balram Garg Vs. Union of India and Anr. – Delhi High Court Read Post »

The issuance of Lookout Circular cannot be resorted to in every case of bank loan defaults or credit facilities availed for business and the Fundamental Right of a citizen of the country to travel abroad cannot be curtailed only because of failure to repay a bank loan – Preet Kaur and Anr. Vs. Bureau of Immigration and Others – Delhi High Court

Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me     Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here to

The issuance of Lookout Circular cannot be resorted to in every case of bank loan defaults or credit facilities availed for business and the Fundamental Right of a citizen of the country to travel abroad cannot be curtailed only because of failure to repay a bank loan – Preet Kaur and Anr. Vs. Bureau of Immigration and Others – Delhi High Court Read Post »

When an award is challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act then a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable – Orris Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Saanvi Interiors India Pvt. Ltd. – Delhi High Court

Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me     Forgot Password In case you’ve already logged in, click here to

When an award is challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act then a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable – Orris Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Saanvi Interiors India Pvt. Ltd. – Delhi High Court Read Post »

Scroll to Top