RP is duty-bound to comply not only with the timelines under CIRP Regulation 35A but also that the opinion and determination required to be made in terms of sub-regulations (1) and (2) in respect of avoidance transactions – Nitesh Kumar More, RP of SPS Steels Ltd. Vs. SPS Steels Ltd. – NCLT Kolkata Bench

Access restricted!

In order to access this content, you're required to login to your account. In case you've already logged in, you are facing access issue because of:

  • you may not have a subscription of the Module/iPlan(iPlan-1, iPlan-2 or iPlan-3) in which this content is published. Click here for more details; or
  • your subscription may expire, you can check here status of your existing subscription. Click here for renewal discount(limited period offer).

Click here to know more about subscription features and our reporting structure.

If you are still facing any issue in login, WhatsApp to +91 9577994433.

Note: If you can't remember your username, you can use your registered email address as “Username” in login form.