0 comments on “Innovative Industries Limited. Vs. Union of India and others- Bombay High Court”

Innovative Industries Limited. Vs. Union of India and others- Bombay High Court

Case Reference: Case Name : Innovative Industries Limited. Vs. Union of India and others. Writ No. : WRIT PETITION (LDG.) NO.  143  OF 2017 Petitioner : Innovative Industries Limited. Respondent : Union of India and others. Date of Judgment : 23-Feb-17 Court : High Court of Bombay Full text of the judgment: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE…

0 comments on “Refusal of registration of the reference sought by a Company by the Registrar, Secretary/Chairman of the BIFR was non-est in law- Bank of New York Mellon London Branch Vs. Zenith Infotech Ltd.- Supreme Court”

Refusal of registration of the reference sought by a Company by the Registrar, Secretary/Chairman of the BIFR was non-est in law- Bank of New York Mellon London Branch Vs. Zenith Infotech Ltd.- Supreme Court

Case Reference: Case Name : Bank of New York Mellon London Branch Vs. Zenith Infotech Limited Appeal No. : Civil Appeal No. 3055 of 2017 Appeal Ref. : S.L.P.(C) No. 1587 of 2015 Appellant : Bank of New York Mellon…

0 comments on “What does “dispute” and “existence of dispute” means for the purpose of determination of a petition under section 9 of the ‘IBC’- Kirusa Software Private Ltd. vs. Mobilox Innovations Private Ltd.- NCLAT”

What does “dispute” and “existence of dispute” means for the purpose of determination of a petition under section 9 of the ‘IBC’- Kirusa Software Private Ltd. vs. Mobilox Innovations Private Ltd.- NCLAT

Brief about decision: In the present case the adjudicating authority has acted mechanically and rejected the application under sub-section (5)(ii)(d) of Section 9 without examining and discussing the aforesaid issue. If the adjudicating authority would have noticed the provisions as…