Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content. Login
What does “dispute” and “existence of dispute” means for the purpose of determination of a petition under section 9 of the ‘IBC’- Kirusa Software Private Ltd. vs. Mobilox Innovations Private Ltd.- NCLAT Case Reference-done, IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT
M/s. Raipur Power & Steel Ltd. & Ors. Vs. M/s. Tomorrow Sales Agency Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT
If any Public depositor applies showing due of the debt claiming itself as operational creditor and the Resolution Professional or the Tribunal do not accept the claim on the ground that they are not financial creditor, we allow the appellant to raise the question before the Tribunal and if any adverse decision is given by the Tribunal, it will be open to the appellant to raise the issue before NCLAT- Hind Motors India Ltd. Vs. Adjudicating Authority NCLT, Chandigarh – NCLAT New Delhi IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT
Era Infra Engineering Ltd Vs. Prideco Commerical Projects Pvt Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT
Notice is required to be given to Corporate Debtor for initiation of CIRP- Innoventive Industries Ltd. Vs. ICICI Bank & Anr.- NCLAT New Delhi Case Reference-done, IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT
Whether filing of a copy of certificate from the Financial Institution maintaining accounts of the Operational Creditor confirming that there is no payment of unpaid operational debt by the Corporate Debtor as prescribed under clause (c) of sub-section 3 of Section 9 of the Code is mandatory or directory – Smart Timing Steel Ltd. Vs. National Steel and Agro Industries Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT