When a specific remedy is available to the aggrieved party, the High Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution is not justified in interfering with the orders of the DRT to examine the correctness of the rejection of the applications – Sh. Vinod Kumar Vs. Himachal Pradesh Financial Corporation – Himachal Pradesh High Court

Access restricted!

In order to access this content, you're required to login to your account. In case you've already logged in, you are facing access issue because of:

  • you may not have a subscription of the Module/iPlan(iPlan-1, iPlan-2 or iPlan-3) in which this content is published. Click here for more details; or
  • your subscription may expire, you can check here status of your existing subscription. Click here for renewal discount(limited period offer).

Click here to know more about subscription features and our reporting structure.

If you are still facing any issue in login, WhatsApp to +91 9577994433.

Note: If you can't remember your username, you can use your registered email address as “Username” in login form.