Appointment of Resolution Professional in case of simultaneous CIRPs against the Principal Borrower as well as the Corporate Debtor – State Bank of India Vs. M/s. Athena Energy Ventures Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT New Delhi
July 6, 2021
By the Impugned Order dated 24.11.2020, NCLAT had held that there could be simultaneous CIRPs against the Principal Borrower as well as the Corporate Debtor and also held that the Adjudicating Authority is requested to appoint the same IRP/RP as has been appointed in the CIRP proceeding against M/s. Athena Chattisgarh Power Ltd. (Principal Borrower).
As per the above orders, Adjudicating Authority admitted application and appointed Mr. C. Bala Mouli IRP/RP, as Mr. C. Bala Mouli was appearing as Resolution Professional for the Principal Borrower-Athena Chattisgarh Power Ltd. It is stated that Mr. C Bala Mouli filed application that now he has attained the age of 70 years and is doubtful if he can continue to act as IRP. M/s. Athena Chattisgarh Power Ltd. (Principal Borrower) is now in Liquidation and that one Mr. Kumar Raajan has been appointed as a Liquidator as per CoC Meeting dated 24.12.2020.
NCLAT held that when it is stated that Principal Borrower is under Liquidation and the CIRP against the Corporate Guarantor Respondent Athena Energy Ventures Pvt. Ltd. is pending, it plainly requires that the Resolution Professional who is working as a Liquidator of the Principal Borrower should be appointed as Resolution Professional for the Corporate Guarantor. There was no harm even if the Adjudicating Authority had passed the orders. However, as it is stated that the orders are not still passed. It would be appropriate that the Adjudicating Authority immediately pass necessary orders.