The words “it shall not be entertained” occurring in the proviso to Sub-Section (5) of Section 43 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, is a preliminary injunction – T. Chitty Babu Vs. Union of India – Madras High Court

Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me     Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here […]

Related Posts:

Whether the provisions of the RERA would apply in case of an ‘Agreement to Lease’? | Whether the definition of the term “Promoter”, as provided under Section 2(zk) in the RERA, would include a ‘Lessor’? | Whether the remedy provided to the ‘Allottees’ under Section 18 of the RERA can be available only against the ‘Promoter’, or, in that sense, also against a ‘Lessor’? – Lavasa Corporation Ltd. Vs. Jitendra Jagdish Tulsiani – Bombay High Court

Case Laws-RERA-High Courts
Scroll to Top