Whether the Company Judge under the Companies Act, 1956 has jurisdiction at the instance of the Official Liquidator to set aside the auction or sale held by the Recovery Officer under the the RDB Act, 1993 or whether the Official Liquidator is required to follow the route as engrafted under the RDB Act by filing an appeal assailing the auction and the resultant confirmation of sale – The Official Liquidator, U.P. and Uttarakhand Vs. Allahabad Bank and others – Supreme Court

Login with GoogleOR Username Password Remember Me     Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here […]

Related Posts:

Whether when the Debt Recovery Tribunal(DRT) under the provisions of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 exercises his power under section 19(18)(e) and appoints a Commissioner for preparation of an inventory of the properties of the defendants, whether prior leave of the Company Judge under the provisions of Companies Act is necessary, since the Company in question is under liquidation and a provisional liquidator has been appointed – State Bank of Hyderabad Vs. Pennar Paterson Ltd. & Anr. – Supreme Court

Case Laws-SARFAESI-Supreme Court, Companies Act-Supreme Court
Scroll to Top