Whether Free Copy which issued under Rule 50 of NCLT Rules, 2016 cannot be taken as to be Certified Copy under the provisions of Rule 22(2) of NCLAT Rules, 2016 to enable to file an appeal under section 61 of IBC – Whitehand Services Vs. RD Buildtech & Developers (Karnataka) Pvt. Ltd. – NCLAT Chennai

In this case, the question is that whether the Free Copy which was supplied to the Appellant becomes irrelevant for the reason being that under NCLAT Rule 22(2), the appeal could be preferred before NCLAT based on the Certified Copy of the Impugned Order, the Certified Copy under statue has defined under Rule 2 of the NCLT Rules which means that it would be the Certified Copy, as it has been provided under section 76 of the Evidence Act and not otherwise.

Related Posts:

If any Public depositor applies showing due of the debt claiming itself as operational creditor and the Resolution Professional or the Tribunal do not accept the claim on the ground that they are not financial creditor, we allow the appellant to raise the question before the Tribunal and if any adverse decision is given by the Tribunal, it will be open to the appellant to raise the issue before NCLAT- Hind Motors India Ltd. Vs. Adjudicating Authority NCLT, Chandigarh – NCLAT New Delhi

IBC-Case Laws-NCLAT
Scroll to Top