In view of the availability of the alternative statutory remedy available by way of proceedings/appeal under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, the High Court ought not to have entertained the writ petition under Article 226 in which the e-­auction notice was under challenge – G. Vikram Kumar Vs. State Bank of Hyderabad  & Ors. – Supreme Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

The settled position of law on the interference of the High Court invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India in Commercial Matters – M/s. South Indian Bank Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Naveen Mathew Philip & Anr. etc. etc. – Supreme Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

In contractual matters, the High Courts do not like to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India – M/s Hornbill Consultants Vs. State of Punjab and Others – Supreme Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

Is the Supreme Court the sole repository of power in terms of section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) to direct transfer of a suit, appeal or other proceeding from a Civil Court in one State to a Civil Court in another State? Or, is it open for a High Court – Shah Newaz Khan & Ors. Vs. State of Nagaland & Ors. – Supreme Court

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.