Case Laws-NI-High Courts

Unless it is found that the view taken by the Court is impossible or perverse, it is not permissible to interfere with the finding of acquittal – Amit Bahl Vs. Sidh Polywraps – Delhi High Court

(2024) ibclaw.in 226 HC IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI Amit Bahlv.Sidh Polywraps CRL.A. 513/2019Decided on 22-Mar-24 Coram: Mr. Justice

Unless it is found that the view taken by the Court is impossible or perverse, it is not permissible to interfere with the finding of acquittal – Amit Bahl Vs. Sidh Polywraps – Delhi High Court Read Post »

If the cheque is drawn not on the account maintained by the accused but by some other person, the same will not attract the provisions of Section 138 of the NI Act – Ashok Kumar Vs. Parveen Kumar and Anr. – Himachal Pradesh High Court

(2024) ibclaw.in 212 HC IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Ashok Kumarv.Parveen Kumar and Anr. Cr. Revision No. 425

If the cheque is drawn not on the account maintained by the accused but by some other person, the same will not attract the provisions of Section 138 of the NI Act – Ashok Kumar Vs. Parveen Kumar and Anr. – Himachal Pradesh High Court Read Post »

Scroll to Top