Mere fact that the accused regularly appeared before the Court and did not attempt to prolong the trial cannot be the sole consideration for declining to exercise discretion to award compensation under Section 143A of NI Act, 1881 – Bajaj Constructions Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. – Bombay High Court

Username Password Remember Me     Forgot Password In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're […]

In case you've already logged in, click here to know why you're not able to access this content.

 

Scroll to Top