Section 66 of IBC – Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 : Fraudulent trading or wrongful trading

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Part-II Insolvency Resolution and Liquidation for Corporate Persons Chapter-VI Adjudicating Authority for Corporate Persons […]

PDFPrint

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

Part-II Insolvency Resolution and Liquidation for Corporate Persons

Chapter-VI Adjudicating Authority for Corporate Persons

Section 66: Fraudulent trading or wrongful trading.

*66. (1) If during the corporate insolvency resolution process or a liquidation process, it is found that any business of the corporate debtor has been carried on with intent to defraud creditors of the corporate debtor or for any fraudulent purpose, the Adjudicating Authority may on the application of the resolution professional pass an order that any persons who were knowingly parties to the carrying on of the business in such manner shall be liable to make such contributions to the assets of the corporate debtor as it may deem fit.

(2) On an application made by a resolution professional during the corporate insolvency resolution process, the Adjudicating Authority may by an order direct that a director or partner of the corporate debtor, as the case may be, shall be liable to make such contribution to the assets of the corporate debtor as it may deem fit, if—

(a) before the insolvency commencement date, such director or partner knew or ought to have known that the there was no reasonable prospect of avoiding the commencement of a corporate insolvency resolution process in respect of such corporate debtor; and

(b) such director or partner did not exercise due diligence in minimising the potential loss to the creditors of the corporate debtor.

1[(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, no application shall be filed by a resolution professional under sub- section (2), in respect of such default against which initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process is suspended as per section 10A.]

Explanation.—For the purposes of this section a director or partner of the corporate debtor, as the case may be, shall be deemed to have exercised due diligence if such diligence was reasonably expected of a person carrying out the same functions as are carried out by such director or partner, as the case may be, in relation to the corporate debtor.


Reference

*Effective from 01.12.2016.

1. Ins. by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Second Amendment) Act, 2020, w.e.f. 05.06.2020.

For interpretation of the Section 43, 45, 46 and 66, refer Anuj Jain IRP for Jaypee Infratech Ltd. v. Axis Bank Ltd. (2020) ibclaw.in 06 SC.



Access complete Bare Act here. To research Section and sub-section wise judgments, visit here.


Follow for daily updates:


Scroll to Top